Jump to content
canflyer
Sign in to follow this  
tcook052

Why the Grits and NDP will merge

Recommended Posts

http://www.stratfordbeaconherald.com/Ar ... ?e=3135379

Why the Grits and NDP will merge

Jack Layton, buoyed by his new role as Leader of the Opposition, says he is not interested in a merger. He claims that the NDP are now the only" true alternative" to the Tories. Alfred Apps, Liberal Party President, maintains that the humbled Grits must remain "a resolutely centralist political party."

It is understandable that a merger is not currently top of mind with any of the opposition parties. But it will be. It is inevitable.

Fast forward a couple of years.

Conservative Throne Speeches and budgets yield few surprises. Harper continues to implement his election platform -- reducing the deficit and the size of government while still maintaining Canada's social safety nets. The economy and the security of Canadians are priorities. Subsidies for political parties are gone, as is the long gun registry. Criminal justice legislation abounds. Family and corporate tax cuts and credits continue. Senate reform is next.

The NDP argue passionately against most of this. But by now they are acutely aware of the limits of opposition. The checks and balances of a minority Parliament are long gone.

Layton has lost his lustre. Managing his unruly Quebec caucus is a constant -- often public -- struggle. Some of his 57 rookie Quebec members are major embarrassments. Others are pushing Layton to articulate his better deal for Quebec, including constitutional reform.

Quebec member loyalties prove tenuous and seats are in jeopardy. Layton realizes that he lacks a stable base from which to unseat the Conservatives.

Meanwhile, the Liberals, with a new leader, reach the limits of their search for relevance. Their initial commitment to remaining a centralist party -- one that would prevent the polarization of Canadian politics -- is not gaining traction.

They try to re-establish themselves on the political spectrum. But they find that much of their traditional policy ground is already occupied by the movement of the Conservatives and NDP towards the center. The Liberals have become victims of their own success.

Party strategists now realize that former Liberal leader Jean Chretien was right in 2010 when he urged Michael Ignatieff to start merger talks with the NDP as the way forward. The arrogance and sense of entitlement that surrounded Ignatieff at that time prevailed. The opportunity was lost.

Elizabeth May strives for attention, but she fails to push the environment or Green Party values any higher on the

national agenda. For most Canadians, economic recovery continues to trump the fight against climate change.

The arithmetic of federal politics begins to weigh heavily on both the NDP and Liberals. By late 2013 the Conservatives have governed for nearly nine years with less than 40% of the popular vote. And they show no interest in replacing the first-past-the-post electoral system. It favours the Conservatives and marginalizes the 60% of the electorate who rejected them.

Without proportional representation it is unlikely that a divided left can defeat a united right -- particularity one that avoids extreme conservatism. Winning a majority government was not Stephen Harper's greatest achievement. That took four trips to the polls. It was uniting the Alliance and Progressive Conservative Parties and then moving them toward the center. That achievement has made everything else possible.

As long as the Liberal brain trust was convinced that they were the country's natural governing party there was no real appetite for courting the NDP. But with the tables turned, and the NDP claiming equality, if not supremacy, the conditions for a merger have improved. Both parties now bring comparable credentials to the merger table.

Money is the life blood of politics. A few years from now the Conservatives are still raising more money from their membership base than the NDP and Liberals combined. And they will have removed the publically financed per-vote subsidy -- a significant source of money for the opposition parties in the past. They find themselves fighting each other for membership and funds. Another reason to consider a merger.

The Conservative majority benefited from Liberal-NDP vote-splitting on a large scale, particularity in Ontario. Dozens of ridings were won by the Tories with little more than a third of the vote. Well before the 2015 election looms, both center-left parties conclude that the only way to avoid a recurrence is for one of them to surge ahead of the Tories (which seems unlikely), or to unite against them.

At first, the policy differences between the parties seem irreconcilable. The NDP are not as comfortable with the free market system as the Liberals. They are more anti-American, have close ties to the trade union movement, and are against involvement in any foreign wars.

But as the merger discussions proceed it becomes clear that there are far more similarities than differences when it comes to major issues. A distinctive and broadly appealing center-left policy platform begins to emerge. It focuses on health care, education, equality of opportunity, the environment, and accountability: all cast in a fiscally responsible frame work.

Meanwhile, Stephen Harper is enjoying his majority. And with the Liberals sidelined, he hopes for his cherished two-party system -- the conservatives against the socialists. He believes that is the recipe for the Conservatives to become Canada's natural governing party. And, he is probably right.

The message for the center-left becomes clear. Unite or lose!

R. Michael Warren is the CEO of the Warren Group. He is a corporate director and former Ontario deputy minister, TTC chief general manager, and CEO of Canada Post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A mixed bag of correct/incorrect analysis, wild speculation and idealistic conclusion based upon the wrong assumption that the NDP and Liberals actually have much in common and inhabit a similar region of the political spectrum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suddenly Jack's health has reignited the Liberal/ND merger speculation:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opi ... le2112070/

When Parliament resumes this fall, we’ll probably be in the peculiar position of having three opposition parties with temporary leaders. This won’t matter the way it would if Mr. Harper still had a minority. He can do whatever he wants now, and nobody can stop him. Yet, Mr. Layton’s absence likely means that Bob Rae (and not Nycole Turmel, Mr. Layton’s greenhorn understudy) will be the most important voice in opposition. Mr. Rae has scarcely any party of his own to lead, but he does have profile, smarts and superb mastery of the sound bite. Also, the Liberals need a merger. Jack said no. But if he’s off the stage, that door might open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A mixed bag of correct/incorrect analysis, wild speculation and idealistic conclusion based upon the wrong assumption that the NDP and Liberals actually have much in common and inhabit a similar region of the political spectrum.

Tcook052 continues with stupid diatribes and thinks he is some kind of pseudo Journalist here.

The libs have taken their beating like grown ups and are moving forward. An NDP/Lib merger are not on. The Libs will reorganize and reinvent themselves to win power back from this current group of incompetent liars. They also won't need to dummy down and reach for the Tcook 052 voters to win power. we don't want muppets in pur party

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An NDP/Lib merger are not on.

You are a really aged addle minded bigot who clearly cannot read or write English well. My post didn't say the merger was on it said the merger speculation had been reignited. :idea:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An NDP/Lib merger are not on.

You are a really aged addle minded bigot who clearly cannot read or write English well. My post didn't say the merger was on it said the merger speculation had been reignited. :idea:

well stupid not on measn its not reignited as far as the Libs are concerned................damn, you are stupid, stubborn and ignorant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, duh, stupid bigot I didn't say merger speculation was on from a Liberal perspective either, or can't you read properly? Perhaps you could learn how to write in English and spell properly. Stupid bigot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, look! Somebody finally found something the Liberal party does well: leadership infighting. :lol:

http://www.thehilltimes.ca/dailyupdate/ ... 07-27-2011

OTTAWA—NDP MPs won't make a play for the party’s leadership while their ailing leader Jack Layton has stepped aside to battle a new cancer because they support Mr. Layton and have learned their lessons from years of watching the federal Liberals fight over leadership, says NDP president Brian Topp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dinosaurs need to nap. :lol: Wake up, old bigot, so we can make sure you're still in the land of the living, old fossil. :lol:

A bigot calling someone else a bigot is rich but being a minimum wage earner you wouldn't understand the word "rich" in that context. EX 4th estate..... :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::roll: mail room boy in a small town radio station was about the highest position reached

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The libs have taken their beating like grown ups and are moving forward.

Taken their beating like grown ups- yes; moving forward - not much evidence yet.

An NDP/Lib merger are not on.

Thankfully.

The Libs will reorganize and reinvent themselves to win power back from this current group of incompetent liars.

The need to reorganize as it is old warhorses with old ideas and assumptions that are holding back a thorough reinvention based upon policy rather than platitudes.

They also won't need to dummy down and reach for the Tcook 052 voters to win power. we don't want muppets in pur party

I guess that was the old Liberal strategy of inhabiting the mushy middle. Glad to see you agree it needs to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×